Siegel Opposes Extension of Lake Osceola Overlay District

 

June 20, 2024

NEWS RELEASE

Siegel Announces Opposition to Extension of

Lake Osceola Overlay District

Susan Siegel, candidate for the Town Board in the July 23rd special election, announced today her opposition to expanding the Lake Osceola Overlay District to include 50 acre Navajo Fields site.

Her opposition is based on her experience with the Underhill Farms development in the Yorktown Heights Overlay District. “Once the Town Board approves including a property in an overlay district, nothing is likely to stop the project,” she said.

Currently zoned for single family houses on 2 acre lots, inclusion in the overlay district would pave the way for a proposed mixed use development of 254 residential units, a 5,500 square foot clubhouse, 4,000 square feet of retail space, a 23,000 square foot athletic structure and the expansion of the site’s existing ballfields.

In exchange for the higher density allowed in the overlay district, the developer, Charles Diven, is offering to construct a sewer trunk line from his property’s Route 6N access point along East Main Street to Hill Boulevard where it would connect to an existing sewer trunk line that carries sewage to the county’s Peekskill treatment plant. According to former supervisor Michael Grace, Diven’s attorney and spokesman, the sewer line is a “compelling reason” for the town to approve the project.

“The only reason the developer wants his property included in the overlay district is to bypass its existing single family zoning and win town approval for an extremely high density mixed use development,” Siegel said. “The Navajo Fields site has no relationship to Lake Osceola or the properties in the existing overlay district. The additional traffic from the development will exacerbate an already dangerous situation along East Main Street.”

Passed in 2021, the Lake Osceola Overlay District allows mixed use developments with more than double the density permitted in the town’s current multi-family zones.  Since the district was created, no development proposals requesting overlay status have been received by the town

While Town Board members have expressed interest in the sewer plan as the key to revitalizing the Jefferson Valley hamlet, Siegel suggested Board members take a closer look at the extent to which sewers would, realistically, result in new commercial development. As desirable as sewers are, Siegel said, sewers may not be a strong enough incentive to attract the commercial development Board members want to encourage.

“They should read the Environmental Assessment report they commissioned in 2021 before adopting the overlay district,” she added.  “The report, prepared by one of Westchester’s leading planning firms, concluded that given the area’s environmental constraints, including steep slopes on the north side of East Main Street and the lake and wetlands on the south side, the potential for new commercial development, even with sewers, was limited. The report actually projected a decrease in commercial development and 139 residential units over a ten-year period.”

The report identified only five possible properties for future commercial development, three of which can be combined into a single site (the former Osceola Beach property) which would be close enough to Hill Boulevard to hook up directly to the existing sewer line. The other two sites at the eastern end of the overlay district abut the lake.

A long-time supporter of sewers for existing residential properties on aging septic systems, Siegel pointed out that the proposed sewer trunk line would not benefit to exiting homeowners to the north of East Main Street.  “Town Board members keep talking about septic leaching into Lake Osceola, but there are no plans to sewer the residential streets in Jefferson Valley. The proposed sewer trunk line will benefit the Navajo Fields developer, not the residents of Jefferson Valley.”

The developer’s request to include his property in the Lake Osceola Overlay District comes after earlier discussions with town officials, dating back almost a year, to either rezone the property to the town’s multi-family zone or create an entirely new zone for the mixed use project went nowhere.

#####

Attached

Map of Lake Osceola Overlay District

Map of proposed extension of the district

Some background

In circa 2009, Mr. Diven proposed a three story structure that would be home to multiple sports activities.  While pursuing that plan, he sought, and received, town permission to establish “temporary” ballfields on a portion of the site.  That plan was subsequently amended to allow for a bubble type      dome over another portion of the site. The three story plan was never pursued.

Over the years as the temporary ballfields and dome were constructed, the developer was found to be in violation of both the town’s and the New York State DEC’s wetlands permits. In 2019, the developer agreed to a settlement with the DEC that involved a $60,000 fine.

Donna Diana Backs Down on Debating Susan Siegel

NEWS RELEASE

June 22, 2024

Donna Diana Backs Down on Debating Susan Siegel

Donna Diana, the Republican candidate for the vacant seat on the Town Board in the July 23rdSpecial Election has decided not to debate her opponent Susan Siegel.

The announcement, in the form of a text message that was sent on Friday, June 21st from Republican Committee Chairman Kevin Byrnes, came as a surprise as the two party chairs had agreed to two tentative dates July 11 or July 12, a few weeks ago. The debate was supposed to have been held at the Yorktown Stage.

“As recently as June 18th, Kevin told me he was waiting for Donna to decide between the two dates,” Mark Lieberman, co-chair of the Yorktown Democratic Committee said. “So you can imagine my surprise at this last minute change.”

Debates between candidates have been a regular feature in Yorktown local elections for years, the last one being in March for the April Special Election for Town Supervisor. Held at the Yorktown Stage, the large size of the audience showed that there was high interest among Yorktown voters in learning more about their candidates.

“I’m obviously disappointed that Yorktown voters will not have the opportunity to experience a live exchange between Ms. Diana and me,” Siegel said. “A live one-on-one exchange is one of the best ways for voters to make up their minds which candidate is most qualified for the job, and best represents their interests.”

Last month, Ms. Diana turned down an offer from the Yorktown News to have her own column in the newspaper. As a result, and out of a sense of fairness, the publisher decided to suspend Siegel’s regular column.

It is unfortunate that the people of Yorktown will not be able to see and hear the contrast between the experienced Ms. Siegel, who is a former Town Supervisor and Town Councilwoman, and Mrs. Diana, who has no town government experience, at a debate.